Reason to trust
How Our News is Made
Strict editorial policy that focuses on accuracy, relevance, and impartiality
Ad discliamer
Morbi pretium leo et nisl aliquam mollis. Quisque arcu lorem, ultricies quis pellentesque nec, ullamcorper eu odio.
Ethereum has slipped below the key $2,000 level again, reflecting renewed selling pressure across the broader crypto market. The move places ETH back in a technically fragile zone, where sentiment tends to deteriorate quickly as traders reassess risk exposure and liquidity conditions tighten.
A recent CryptoQuant report provides additional context by analyzing so-called “accumulating addresses,” a specific class of wallets designed to isolate long-term conviction holders. These addresses show no history of outflows, have received at least 100 ETH in their latest inflow, recorded multiple inbound transactions, maintain balances above 100 ETH, and have remained active over the past seven years while excluding exchanges, miners, and smart contract wallets.
According to the report, these accumulation addresses now hold roughly 27 million ETH, representing about 23% of the circulating supply. This concentration suggests that a significant share of Ethereum remains in strong hands despite recent volatility.
Still, persistent selling pressure below $2,000 highlights the market’s sensitivity to macro conditions, leverage dynamics, and shifting capital flows, leaving Ethereum at a critical inflection point in the near term. Whether buyers defend this area or allow further downside will likely shape sentiment, volatility expectations, and short-term positioning across the Ethereum derivatives and spot markets.
Ethereum Trades Below Accumulating Address Realized Price
Ethereum’s recent price action gains additional context from the same CryptoQuant analysis. It highlights how ETH is currently trading relative to the Realized Price of accumulating addresses. This metric reflects the average acquisition cost of long-term conviction holders — wallets that consistently receive ETH without distributing it back to the market. Historically, trading below this level has been rare and often associated with periods of elevated stress.
According to the report, ETH has traded below the Realized Price of these accumulating addresses only twice over the past nine years. The first occurrence happened during the 2025 cycle low. A time when broad market weakness and liquidity contraction pushed prices into deep discount territory. The second instance has been unfolding since January 2026. Suggesting that current market conditions are again testing long-term holder cost bases.
From a structural standpoint, this type of deviation can carry two interpretations. It may signal capitulation and undervaluation, where weak hands exit while stronger investors accumulate. Alternatively, prolonged trading below realized cost levels can reflect persistent macro headwinds, subdued demand, or leverage unwinds delaying recovery.
Price Action Showing Weakness
Ethereum’s price action continues to show structural weakness on the weekly chart, with ETH recently losing the psychological $2,000 level after failing to hold above its key moving averages. The break below this zone places the price back under the mid-cycle support area that previously acted as both accumulation and breakout territory.
ETH remains below the shorter-term weekly moving average. The longer-term trend lines appear to be flattening, reflecting slowing momentum rather than clear trend continuation. Volume patterns also suggest distribution, with recent selloffs accompanied by rising activity, typically associated with risk reduction and position unwinding.
Historically, similar setups have preceded either extended consolidation phases or deeper corrective moves. It usually depends largely on broader liquidity conditions and macro risk appetite. If buyers fail to reclaim the $2,000 region quickly, downside targets could shift toward previous high-volume nodes near the $1,600–$1,700 range. Where historical demand previously emerged.
Conversely, a decisive recovery above that level would improve sentiment. And would also suggest the recent move was primarily a leverage-driven flush rather than the start of a broader structural downtrend for Ethereum in this cycle. Until then, price action likely remains sensitive to macro liquidity shifts and derivatives market positioning dynamics overall.
Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com
