Reason to trust
How Our News is Made
Strict editorial policy that focuses on accuracy, relevance, and impartiality
Ad discliamer
Morbi pretium leo et nisl aliquam mollis. Quisque arcu lorem, ultricies quis pellentesque nec, ullamcorper eu odio.
When investing in crypto projects, especially at the outset or during public token offerings, understanding the underlying economic design is essential. A poorly structured model can result in volatility, early dumps, or long-term devaluation.
In 2025, with thousands of new launches on Ethereum, Solana, TON, and other chains, careful analysis of tokenomics remains one of the best ways to manage investment risk.
This guide explains the key indicators for effective evaluation and provides real-world examples of ventures that failed due to flawed approaches.
Why Tokenomics Matters
Tokenomics covers the structure of a crypto asset—everything from total supply and distribution to vesting, utility, and its economic mechanisms. A well-designed model strikes a balance between long-term sustainability and immediate incentives, while poor frameworks can lead to inflated supply, insider sell-offs, or limited real-world application.
Let’s look at the most important factors to consider before making an investment.
1. Total and Circulating Supply
The total and circulating supply shape a token’s inflationary or deflationary profile, influencing its market cap and price discovery.
What to Look For:
- Max cap: Is the total supply fixed (for example, 1 billion tokens)?
- Circulating vs. locked: Are most tokens available for trading, or are they locked?
- Red flag: If only 5–10% of tokens are circulating at launch, insiders may control the price.
For example, SafeMoon had aggressive transaction taxes and a vast token pool. With most tokens locked and a limited float, high speculation drove price manipulation risks, contributing to its eventual collapse.
2. Token Unlock Schedule (Vesting)
Vesting schedules prevent large holders (such as the team, advisors, and early investors) from flooding the market with tokens all at once. In 2025, virtually all established projects use these controls to protect their ecosystems.
What to Look For:
- Cliff periods: A lock-up period before any tokens become available (e.g., six months).
- Linear or tranche vesting: Gradual release over time.
- Transparency: Access to unlock calendars and detailed distribution plans.
A recent misstep was Parrot Protocol (PRT), which initially raised $80 million but offered little clarity on treasury use and token unlocks. When a DAO vote denied redemptions, the token price collapsed, highlighting how poor vesting design erodes trust.
Conversely, MultiBank Group, one of the most highly regulated financial institutions, has released clear details for its MBG token:
- Team and advisors: 6-month cliff, 36-month vesting
- Private rounds: 12-month vesting in 5 tranches
- Ecosystem rewards: 24-month linear vesting
This sort of open communication is key in order to ensure that large amounts of tokens are not sold suddenly, which might cause the price to crash.
3. Token Utility & Use-Cases
A token must serve a real purpose within the protocol or product. Without utility, it’s just a speculative asset.
What to Look For:
- Is the token required for anything? (e.g., governance, staking, gas fees)
- Does it enable core platform functions?
Examples of Strong Use Cases:
- ETH is used for gas on Ethereum
- DYDX governs its derivatives protocol
- MBG is designed for fees, ecosystem rewards, and market making
4. Token Distribution & Fairness
When too many tokens are held by founders, advisors, or early backers, it can lead to governance centralization and price manipulation.
What to Look For:
- Community allocation: Is there enough reserved for users and builders?
- Team/investor ratio: How much does the team or VC hold?
- Airdrops or waitlist rewards: Were these mechanisms used to attract genuine participants?
For example, a project called Hector Network adopted an OlympusDAO-style model with massive treasury overreach. The team controlled too much of the supply and eventually pulled the plug, resulting in a loss of trust.
5. Burn or Buyback Mechanisms
Deflationary mechanisms help support price by gradually reducing the token supply.
What to Look For:
- Scheduled burns: Are tokens regularly burned based on usage?
- Revenue-based buybacks: Are earnings used to reduce supply?
- Transparency: Is the policy for burns or buybacks clearly outlined and enforced?
A strong example is Ethereum’s EIP-1559, which introduced base-fee burns, helping make ETH deflationary during periods of high activity.
MultiBank is another example. It plans to remove 50% of MBG tokens from supply using platform fees over time, creating ongoing scarcity that may benefit holders. These kinds of mechanisms are positive signs of a well-designed deflationary model.
6. On-Chain Liquidity & Exchange Listings
On-chain liquidity refers to how easily a token can be bought or sold on decentralized exchanges (DEXes) without triggering major price swings.
A healthy market for a token is marked by deep trading pairs, which means there are plenty of tokens available for buying and selling, and trades can be executed with minimal price impact. When trading activity is thin, tokens become vulnerable to manipulation, and it can be challenging for holders to sell without taking a loss.
What to Look For:
- DEX depth: Can tokens be bought/sold without excessive slippage?
- CEX listings: Are they listed on trusted, high-volume exchanges?
- Market making: Is there a dedicated liquidity provision?
Check whether a portion of tokens is allocated to seed large pools on DEXes like Uniswap or PancakeSwap. Tools such as DeFiLlama or DexTools let you review daily trading activity and pool sizes.
Tokenomics should clarify if professional market makers are onboard to stabilize trading across platforms. Without sufficient on-chain liquidity, even well-designed tokens can fail due to high volatility and slippage, especially during periods of high activity.
Summary Table: Key Tokenomics Indicators
| Indicator | What to Check | Risk Red Flags |
| Total Supply | Max cap, circulating vs. locked | >90% locked early on |
| Vesting Schedule | Team/investor cliffs, linear tranches | No lockups, vague timelines |
| Utility & Use Case | Used for gas, governance, access, and fees | No real product usage |
| Distribution & Fairness | Balanced team/community/investor mix | >50% held by insiders |
| Burn/Buyback Mechanics | Fee-based burns, revenue buybacks | No deflationary design |
| Liquidity & Listings | CEX/DEX depth, market making | No liquidity plan or access |
Evaluating tokenomics is not just about reading allocation charts. It means assessing whether a token has the right mechanisms to protect investor interests, incentivize long-term users, and support sustainable value creation.
Projects like SafeMoon, Hector Network, and Parrot Protocol serve as lessons in how tokenomic flaws can undermine otherwise promising narratives.
As more investors enter the crypto space in 2025, running a simple tokenomics audit using these six pillars can help you avoid costly mistakes. Don’t just buy into the vision—verify the design.
