Reason to trust
How Our News is Made
Strict editorial policy that focuses on accuracy, relevance, and impartiality
Ad discliamer
Morbi pretium leo et nisl aliquam mollis. Quisque arcu lorem, ultricies quis pellentesque nec, ullamcorper eu odio.
The crypto community has been sitting at the edge of their seats watching the complex and nuanced situation surrounding the now defunct QuadrigaCX exchange unfold. Recently, news broke that Big Four Auditing Firm, Ernst & Young (EY), had discovered that the exchange’s cold storage wallets were nearly entirely empty, which came as a surprise to many hopeful victims of the exchange.
Now, however, the situation has grown in complexity after the widow of QuadrigaCX’s now deceased co-founder and CEO, Gerry Cotton, claimed that he was mixing his personal funds with company funds in an effort to make customers whole during a previous legal battle with a bank.
QuadrigaCX’s Troubles Began Far Before CEO’s Death
Although the crypto community first grew aware of QuadrigaCX’s illiquidity following Cotton’s death earlier this year, a recent statement from his wife and the executor of his estate, Jennifer Robertson, elucidates that the exchange’s troubles began long before his death.
“While I had no direct knowledge of how Gerry operated the business, he told me that he had been putting his own money back into QCX to fund user withdrawals in 2018 while the CIBC money remained frozen,” Robertson explained in a recent statement to CoinDesk that was sent by law firm Stewart McKelvey.
Her statement comes just a few weeks after court-appointed auditing firm Ernst & Young discovered that the cold wallet addresses associated with the exchange were empty, which dispelled the rumor that the stem of the exchange’s problems was simply a lack of access to user’s funds.
Furthermore, as NewsBTC previously covered, an investigative report published on the Zerononcense Blog has claimed that Cotton may have been moving up to 600,000 Ethereum (ETH) from cold storage and into a plethora of exchanges.
“Based on the transaction analysis included in the report, it appears that a significant amount of Ethereum (600,000+ ETH) was transferred to these exchanges as a means of ‘storage’ during the years that QuadrigaCX was in operation and offering Ethereum on their exchange… it is very possible that QuadrigaCX, the creditors, and other entities are unaware of this discovery,” the Zerononcense Blog report explained.
Do the Exchange’s Victims Have a Chance of Recovering Their Lost Funds?
If it is true that Cotton had been transferring hundreds of thousands of ETH into accounts held at various cryptocurrency exchanges, and these funds can be tracked, then there is a possibility that the victims of QuadrigaCX’s illiquidity may be able to recover some, or all, of their lost funds.
Robertson further affirmed in her statement that her main goal is to is to give affected users the greatest chance of recovering their lost assets.
“Following my husband, Gerald (Gerry) Cotten’s sudden and unexpected death, I arranged for the CCAA process to start by providing the initial funding and agreeing to act as a director of the Companies. The goal from the outset of the CCAA proceeding was to benefit QCX and the Affected Users by giving QCX the greatest chance of recovery of its assets,” she claimed.
At the time, it still seems as though user’s best chance of recovering any funds is that the ETH Cotton reportedly transferred is still sitting, untouched, in accounts on the various exchanges.
Featured image from Shutterstock.
